href="@public@vhost@g@gutenberg@html@files@17201@17201-h@17201-h-6.htm.html#Page_200" class="pginternal" tag="{http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml}a">200
If it is to be cured, it must be faced
200
It takes the form of a suppressed longing for the religious faith that is lost
200
And this longing is wide-spread, though only expressed indirectly
201
It is felt even by men of science
202
But the longing seems fruitless
203
This dejection is in fact shared by the believers
203
And is even authoritatively recognised by Catholicism
204
The great question for the world now, and the one on which its whole future depends, is, will the lost faith ever be recovered?
205
The answer to this will probably have to be decisive, one way or the other
206
CHAPTER IX.
THE LOGIC OF SCIENTIFIC NEGATION.
What gives the denials of positivism their general weight, is the impression that they represent reason
208
They are supported by three kinds of arguments: physical, moral, and historical
209
The two first bear upon all religion; the latter only on special revelations
210
Natural religion is the belief in God, immortality, and the possibility of miracles generally
210
Physical science prefers to destroy natural religion by its connection of mind with matter
210
1st. Making conscious life a function of the brain. 2nd. Evolving the living organisms from lifeless matter. 3rd. Making this material evolution automatic
210
Thus all external proofs of God are destroyed
212
And also of the soul's immortality
213
External proof is declared to be the test of reality
213
And therefore all religion is set down as a dream
215
But we believe that proof
is the test of reality, not because it is proved to be so, but because of the authority of those who tell us so
215
But it will be found that these men do not understand their own principle
216
And, that in what they consider their most important conclusions they emphatically disregard it
217
One or other, therefore, of their opinions is worthless—their denial of religion or their affirmation of morality
219
But we shall see this more clearly in considering the question of consciousness and will
220
We shall see that, as far as science can inform us, man is nothing but an automaton
220
But the positive school are afraid to admit this
221
And not daring to meet the question, they make a desperate effort to confuse it
222
Two problems are involved in the matter: 1st. How is brain action connected with consciousness
223
2nd. Is the consciousness that is connected with it something separable from, and independent of it
223
The first of these problems has no bearing at all on any moral or religious question. It is insoluble. It leaves us not in doubt but in ignorance
224
The doubt, and the religious question is connected solely with the second problem
228
To which there are two alternative solutions
228
And modern science is so confused that it will accept neither
228
As Dr. Tyndall's treatment of the subject very forcibly shows us
230
And Dr. Tyndall in this way is a perfect representative of the whole modern positive school
231
Let us compare the molecules of the brain to the six moving billiard-balls
231
The question is, are these movements due to the stroke of one cue or of two
233
The positive school profess to answer this question both ways
234
But this profession is nonsense
236
What they really mean is, 1st. That the connection of consciousness with matter is a mystery; as to
that they
can give no answer. 2nd. That as to whether consciousness is wholly a material thing or no, they
will give no answer
237
But why are they in this state of suspense?
238
Though their system does not in the least require the hypothesis of an immaterial element in consciousness
239
They see that the moral value of life does
239
The same reasons that will warrant their saying it
may exist, will constrain them to say it
must
240
Physical science, with its proofs, can say nothing in the matter, either as to will, immortality, or God
242
But, on the other hand, it will force us, if we believe in will, to admit the reality of miracles
243
So far as science goes, morality and religion are both on the same footing
243
CHAPTER X.
MORALITY AND NATURAL THEISM.
Supposing science not to be inconsistent with theism, may not theism be inconsistent with morality?
247
It seems to be so; but it is no more so than is morality with itself. Two difficulties common to both:—1st. The existence of evil; 2nd. Man's free will and God's free will
248
James Mill's statement of the case represents the popular anti-religious arguments
249
But his way of putting the case is full of distortion and exaggeration
250
Though certain of the difficulties he pointed out were real
251
And those we cannot explain away; but if we are to believe in our moral being at all, we must one and all accept
252
We can escape from them by none of the rationalistic substitutes for religion
252
A similar difficulty is the freedom of the will
257
This belief is an intellectual impossibility
258
But at the same time a moral necessity
260
It is typical of all the difficulties attendant on an assent to our own moral nature
260
The vaguer difficulties that appeal to the
moral imagination we must meet in the same way
261
CHAPTER XI.
THE HUMAN RACE AND REVELATION.
Should the intellect of the world return to theism, will it ever again acknowledge a special revelation?
264
We can see that this is an urgent question
265
By many general considerations
265
Especially the career of Protestantism
267
Which is visibly evaporating into a mere natural theism
268
And, as such, is losing all restraining power in the world
271
Where then shall we look for a revelation? Not in any of the Eastern creeds
275
The claims of the Roman Church are the only ones worth considering
276
Her position is absolutely distinct from that of Protestantism, and she is not involved in its fall
277
In theory she is all that the enlightened world could require
279
The only question is, is she so in practice? This brings us to difficulties
282
1st. The partial success of her revelation; and her supposed condemnation of the virtues of unbelievers. But her partial success is simply the old mystery of evil
282
And through her infinite charity, she does nothing to increase that difficulty
283
The value of orthodoxy is analogous to the value of true physical science
285
All should try to learn the truth who can; but we do not condemn others who cannot
286
Even amongst Catholics generally no recondite theological knowledge is required
287
The facts of the Catholic
religion are simple. Theology is the complex scientific explanation of them
288
Catholicism is misunderstood because the outside world confuses with its religion—1st. The complex explanations of it
289
2nd. Matters of discipline, and practical rules
290
3rd. The pious opinions, or the scientific errors of private persons, or particular epochs
291
None of which really are any integral part of the Church
293
Neither are the peculiar exaggerations of moral feeling that have been prevalent at different times
293
The Church theoretically is a living, growing, self-adapting organism
295
She is, in fact, the growing, moral sense of mankind organised and developed under a supernatural tutelage
295
CHAPTER XII.
UNIVERSAL HISTORY AND THE CLAIMS OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH.
We must now consider the Church in relation to history and external historical criticism
297
1st. The history of Christianity; 2nd. The history of other religions
298
Criticism has robbed the Bible of nearly all the supposed internal evidences of its supernatural character
298
It has traced the chief Christian dogmas to non-Christian sources
300
It has shown that the histories of other religions are strangely analogous to the history of Christianity
300
And to Protestantism these discoveries are fatal
302
But they are not fatal to Catholicism, whose attitude to history is made utterly different by the doctrine of the perpetual infallibility of the Church
305
The Catholic Church teaches us to believe the Bible for her sake, not her for the Bible's
305
And even though her dogmas may have existed in some form elsewhere, they become new
revelations to us, by her supernatural selection of them
306
The Church is a living organism, for ever selecting and assimilating fresh nutriment
307
Even from amongst the wisdom of her bitterest enemies
309
All false revelations, in so far as they have professed to be infallible, are, from the Catholic standpoint, abortive Catholicisms
311
Catholicism has succeeded in the same attempt in which they have failed
313
CHAPTER XIII.
BELIEF AND WILL.
The aim of this book
315
Has been to clear the great question as to man's nature, and the proper way of regarding him, from the confusion at present surrounding it
317
And to show that the answer will finally rest, not on outer evidence, but on himself, and on his own
will, if he have a will
319
NOTE.
In this book the words 'positive,' 'positivist,' and 'positivism' are of constant occurrence as applied to modern thought and thinkers. To avoid any chance of confusion or misconception, it will be well to say that these words as used by me have no special reference to the system of Comte or his disciples, but are applied to the common views and position of the whole scientific school, one of the most eminent members of which—I mean Professor Huxley—has been the most trenchant and contemptuous critic that 'positivism' in its narrower sense has met with. Over 'positivism' in this sense Professor Huxley and Mr. Frederic Harrison have had some public battles. Positivism in the sense in which it is used by
Comments (0)